Blog
"One's output must never exceed one's input."
So said a wise former editor of mine. So, from the vast jumble of words that I read each day, here's some interesting reads and notable work from talented human beings. Inspired by Kottke.org.
-
Dolly Parton's popularity
Dolly Parton is the most popular person in America, an (actually quite rigorous) poll finds:
Parton has a net favorability of +65, 50 points higher than Barack Obama (+14) or Volodymyr Zelensky (+13), and more than 60 points above the just-barely-positive Taylor Swift (+3). Of course this doesnāt directly translate to popularity; a T-Swift tour will outsell Parton 100 times out of 100. The poll suggests that though Swift may be a juggernaut, nearly as many people loathe her as like her. With Dolly, thereās love everywhere you look.
While itās just one poll, UMass Lowell is a reputable pollster; Silver Bulletin gives them an A-. Dolly is included in the questions in part because sheās an example of a genuinely beloved figure, which is rare in these often less-than United States. Sheās used as a bar that no politicians seem able to reach. Even Swift at +3 far outpaces most national figures in office.
We should never be drawn too much on this, obviously, but I do think it's notable how Dolly is, at the core of it, an unashamed and unequivocating liberal (or what American's consider "liberal," in our absurd times).
She was so pro-Covid vaccine she funded its development. On LGBT rights, she said "We are all god's children, we are who we are. We should be allowed to be who we are."
Has she spoken on all issues? No. But you couldn't accuse of her of not doing her bit to promote some sanity among the madness.
-
The end of the anecdotal lede
Former ProPublica president Richard Tofel declares the days of the "anecdotal lede" to be numbered. Among the reasons why, he says, is how AI might change our habits:
AI is another important factor pushing in the same direction. How much AI is going to take over news delivery is, I think, more of an open question than some techno-enthusiasts believe. But there is no real question that the degree to which content will come to us filtered through AI will grow substantially. And AI is simply going to strip away the grace (and, I am afraid, the power) of anecdotal ledes from those who insist on continuing to employ them. If you are summarizing a story, Kilgoreās nut graf survivesāit even floats to the top. But the slow slide into the pool of the anecdotal lede is deemed surplusage.
"And not before time!" says a room of grumpy editors. (I'm not in that room.)
Tofel talks about the bulleted AI-generated summaries many news orgs (including the one I work for) are placing on top of stories these days. Why have this and then drop into an anecdotal lede? It's a good point. But I'm not giving up the right to an anecdotal lede that easily. I have two simple rules. First, the anecdote needs to be extremely relevant to the story at hand. Second, the anecdote needs to actually be good.
-
Threatening the Church
Christopher Hale in his 'Letters from Leo' newsletter:
In January, behind closed doors at the Pentagon, Under Secretary of War for Policy Elbridge Colby summoned Cardinal Christophe Pierre ā Pope Leo XIVās then-ambassador to the United States ā and delivered a lecture.
āAmerica,ā Colby and his colleagues told the cardinal, āhas the military power to do whatever it wants in the world. The Catholic Church had better take its side.ā
Read it all: The Pentagon Threatened Pope Leo XIVās Ambassador With the Avignon Papacy
-
One word a minute
This 2,800-word essay took me 45 hours to write. I wrote it from scratch five times, and only 10% of my words made the final cut. That comes out to an average pace of one word per minute; imagine typing a single word, taking a brief walk, and then coming back to type the next. Writing happens at an unbearably slow pace for a culture thatās glued to vertical feeds with split-second reward loops, but thinking takes time. Good thinking takes a lot of time and even more toil. Essay writing is a process Iāve grown to love, a process I believe is deeply human, and yet itās a process thatās becoming endangered.
-- Michael Dean: Essay Writing as Personal Sovereignty
-
The simple North Korean test
Facing a problem of North Koreans posing as different nationalities for remote jobs, one tech start-up implements a simple test: Will they insult Kim Jong-Un?
Here is a video of a North Korean IT worker being stopped dead in their tracks upon being required to insult Kim Jong Un.
— tanuki42 (@tanuki42_) April 6, 2026
It won't work forever, but right now it's genuinely an effective filter. I'm yet to come across one who can say it. https://t.co/8FFVPxNm8X pic.twitter.com/KXI5efMo5LTechCrunch has more on the practice here.
-
Bluesky isn't growing
James Ball on Bluesky's (lack of) growing pains:
This is the better question about this stuff: most of us arenāt technology investors. We just want a social network we can use, and which ideally isnāt full of fascists, trolls, and bots. Blueskyās small size can feel like a bonus against that backdrop: for many of its current users, the network feels fine as it is. Why worry about it growing? Iām getting what I need from it now.
The problem is monetisation: Bluesky costs a lot of money to run, and at present the bills are being paid by investors. They donāt do this out of the goodness of their hearts. They do so in the hope of making vastly more money later. Generally, investors will be happy to subsidise the losses of a company if it is growing, especially if it is growing fast.
-
One less person
Hamilton Nolan:
No, I will not be joining in the chorus of condemnation. On the contrary. If you are a professional writer, I want you to use AI. Because this industry is competitive. Iāll take any advantage I can get. And if you want to make your writing suck, thatās all the better for me. One less person outshining me.
Read the rest: Go Ahead and Use AI. It Will Only Help Me Dominate You.
-
A clear violation
A note attached to a New York Times book review:
Editorsā Note: March 30, 2026:
A reader recently alerted The Times that this review included language and details similar to those in a review of the same book published in The Guardian. We spoke to the author of this piece, a freelancer reviewer, who told us he used an A.I. tool that incorporated material from the Guardian review into his draft, which he failed to identify and remove. His reliance on A.I. and his use of unattributed work by another writer are a clear violation of The Timesās standards. The reviewer said he had not used A.I. in his previous reviews for The Times, and we have found no issues in those pieces. The Guardian review of āWatching Over Herā can be read here.
-
You can't defeat the robots
Minnesota Twins manager Derek Shelton becomes to the first to be ejected from the game for becoming infuriated at the decision of the robot umpire.
This season, which started this weekend, is the first to include the controversial technology.
The commentator's call is pretty special:
"He's arguing with the robots"
— FanDuel (@FanDuel) March 29, 2026
The ABS system has been awesome so far š¤£pic.twitter.com/ZVKWSeeYXo -
We would use different words
Colby Hall in Mediaite on how we've stopped being stunned by the batshit cabinet meetings hosted by President Trump, one of which was held on Thursday and lasted 98 minutes. Hall:
Hereās what I keep coming back to: if a transcript from this meeting came from the government of Brazil ā or Hungary, or any country we cover from a comfortable critical distance ā we would not file it as a cabinet meeting. We would write about it as a document. We would ask what it reveals about the man producing it and the institution that has formed around him. We would use different words.
But we donāt use different words for Trump. We stopped a long time ago, so gradually that Iām not sure anyone made a conscious decision to stop. It just became the way the job gets done.
And I say āweā deliberately, because Mediaite runs the clips too. We package the highlights. We write the posts. Iāve written more of them than I care to admit, and Iāll probably write more, as the traffic they generate is part of what keeps the lights on here. So Iām not throwing stones from outside the house. I live in this house. Thatās actually why it bothers me.